Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy A12's 80.3 general score. IPhone X's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A12, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone X features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a lot greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone X has a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A12, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone X has a little faster processor than Galaxy A12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Galaxy A12 features a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.