Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 463 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32's score of 84.7. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone X is incredibly older than Samsung Galaxy A32, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a superior processor than Galaxy A32, because although it has less cpu cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone X has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher number of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The iPhone X counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.