Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a bit better than the Galaxy A60, having an 88.1 score against 82.3. Even though the iPhone X is older and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A60, it's body is still just a bit thinner. Apple iPhone X features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little better pixel density.
IPhone X has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has lesser processing cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone X captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A60, although it has a lower video definition, a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot less MP.
IPhone X features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A60 features improved battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.