Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than the Apple iPhone X, having a general score of 90.5 against 88.1. Galaxy A90 5G is a newer cellphone than Apple iPhone X, although it's heavier and just a little thicker. IPhone X has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.