Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 81. Even though the iPhone X and Galaxy C9 Pro were released with only a few months difference, iPhone X's construction is just a little thicker but just a little bit lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution.
The iPhone X counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Apple iPhone X counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent more battery size. Apple iPhone X shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.