Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30s, getting a global score of 88.1 against 83.3. Apple iPhone X is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M30s, but it is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Apple iPhone X has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Galaxy M30s shoots much better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
IPhone X features a bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy M30s counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 121 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.