Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Galaxy M31, getting a score of 88.1 against 86.5. Apple iPhone X is an older cellphone than the Galaxy M31, but it is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone X has a bit better processor than Galaxy M31, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density, a brighter screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution. IPhone X counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 captures much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 121 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.