Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, having an 88.1 score against 79.3. The iPhone X design is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Apple iPhone X features a much better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone X, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch. The iPhone X features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, a worse video quality and a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
IPhone X has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S6 edge+, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.