Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-10-17 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xperia XZ3's 79.6 score. Although the iPhone X is older than Xperia XZ3, it's body is noticeably thinner and a bit lighter. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit sharper display than iPhone X, because although it has a bit darker display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite larger display.
The iPhone X features a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. IPhone X has just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ3, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size. The Xperia XZ3 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way higher 19 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Apple iPhone X is more expensive than Sony Xperia XZ3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.