Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Although iPhone X is incredibly older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a lot lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a much bigger screen, a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and way more brightness.
IPhone X features a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because it has a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Apple iPhone X is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.