Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. The iPhone X design has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it is just a little bit lighter. Apple iPhone X has a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro and iPhone X both have incredibly similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage. The iPhone X features a little faster processor than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The vivo X60 Pro captures much better photos and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much higher resolution back camera and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 55 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.