Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's global score of 76.4. The Apple iPhone X construction is newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s. IPhone X has a superior performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The iPhone X features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a little larger screen, a bit more brightness, a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a quite greater pixel density. IPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a way smaller sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega pixels camera in the back, the iPhone X also counts with better video frame rate and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
IPhone X has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi 5s. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi 5s, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.