Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's score of 85.5. IPhone X is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but Apple was able to make it a little lighter and thinner. The Apple iPhone X has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and 5 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone X has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a little bit more screen brightness and a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone X, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.