Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 overall score. IPhone XR's body is way newer, but just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. IPhone XR has a quite better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better display than iPhone XR, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixel amount per inch in the screen. The iPhone XR counts with just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, a lower video definition and a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Google Nexus 6P features just a little better battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Nexus 6P. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.