Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. Apple iPhone XR's body is newer, but just a little thicker and notably heavier than Google Pixel 2. The iPhone XR has a better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Google Pixel 2 has a bit better screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 2 features a very superior memory for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone XR features just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 2942mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. IPhone XR captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lesser mega pixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone XR also counts with a bigger camera sensor.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.