Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-26 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than the Google Pixel XL, with an 82 score against 81.3. Even though the Apple iPhone XR is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. Google Pixel XL has a little sharper screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel number per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The iPhone XR features a quite better performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a 64-bit processing unit. The Google Pixel XL has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone XR counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, a worse video quality and a tinier sensor, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments. Google Pixel XL counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Apple iPhone XR is also cheaper than the Google Pixel XL, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.