Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a overall score of 82 against 77.9. Even though the Apple iPhone XR is just a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's a lot thinner and a lot newer. IPhone XR counts with a little faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit CPU and 2 more cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid display than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much better display pixels density. IPhone XR shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with as much storage for games and applications as the iPhone XR, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo has superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone XR, else you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.