Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting an 82 score against 81.2. The iPhone XR is an a lot older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has much more brightness, a little bit larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
IPhone XR has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Motorola Edge 50 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 features a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 70 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.