Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 82 score against 79.7. The iPhone XR is an older and just a little bit heavier device than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Apple was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, although it has a quite worse pixel number in each screen inch, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a bit smaller display.
The Apple iPhone XR features a better processing power than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Moto G Stylus counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures, a camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.