Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Moto Z4, getting an 82 score against 79.8. The Apple iPhone XR design is somewhat heavier and thicker than Moto Z4. Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a quite smaller display and a quite lower display pixel density.
The Apple iPhone XR features a greater processing power than Moto Z4, because although it has less processing cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Moto Z4 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto Z4 counts with a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z4, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.