Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than iPhone XR, getting a general score of 91.8 against 82. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer, a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than iPhone XR. IPhone XR counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 lesser cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XR has a slightly better display than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a lot lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a bit lower screen density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 53 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A71 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.