Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than iPhone XR, having a score of 90.5 against 82. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a just a little heavier cellphone than the iPhone XR, but they are equally thin. Apple iPhone XR has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit lower display pixel density.
IPhone XR has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.