Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-26 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a bit better than Galaxy S23 Ultra's global score of 81.5. IPhone XR has an extremely better processor than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XR features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a way lower 828 x 1792 resolution, a little bit smaller display and way less pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments, a lot larger sensor taking way better quality pictures and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.