Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82 score against 77.8. The iPhone XR construction is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's extremely thicker and was released many years before. The iPhone XR counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a really bigger display, a higher pixel density, a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a way brighter screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
IPhone XR not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.