Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 82 against 78.8. Despite being the best in our current comparison, iPhone XR is a older, a bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone than vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a screen that is just as good as the Apple iPhone XR one, although the vivo X60 Pro also has a bit better pixel amount per display inch, a higher 1080 x 2376px resolution and a quite bigger display.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone XR has a little better performance than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.