Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, with an 85.5 score against 82. Although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the Apple iPhone XR were released only a couple of months apart, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is just a little thicker but just a bit lighter. The iPhone XR features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better looking display than iPhone XR, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 2246 resolution, a little bigger display and a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XR, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, a same size back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution back camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.