Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6, with an 84.5 score against 81.1. IPhone XS Max's body is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than the Google Nexus 6's, although it's also somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a 64 bits processor, 2 more cores and more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with just a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Google Nexus 6 counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as iPhone XS Max, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The iPhone XS Max and the Google Nexus 6 both count with incredibly similar batteries duration, although the Google Nexus 6 also has a 1 percent more battery capacity. IPhone XS Max has a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
IPhone XS Max is a bit more expensive than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.