Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue, Red and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than the LG K52, with an 84.5 score against 76. The iPhone XS Max is a notably older and somewhat heavier cellphone than LG K52, but Apple was able to build it just a little bit thinner anyway. The iPhone XS Max counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG K52, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max features an incredibly better looking display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a much greater pixels density. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a lot tinier sensor shooting way worse quality photographs, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
LG K52 has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 features superior battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.