Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Titan gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max's global score of 84.5. The LG K92 body is noticeably newer and just a bit lighter, but a little thicker than the Apple iPhone XS Max. Apple iPhone XS Max has a sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1242 x 2688px resolution and a little bit greater screen density.
LG K92 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone XS Max counts with a superior processor than LG K92, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The LG K92 has better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26% more battery capacity. The LG K92 has a better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG K92 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.