Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than LG Q70, with an 84.5 score against 77.9. IPhone XS Max's design is just a bit thinner than the LG Q70, but it is just a little bit heavier and was released around a year before. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a brighter screen than LG Q70, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a little greater screen pixels density and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
IPhone XS Max has a faster CPU than LG Q70, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The LG Q70 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot better 32 mega pixels resolution camera.
LG Q70 features a much greater memory for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG Q70, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.