Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 84.5 score against 81.3. The iPhone XS Max is a notably heavier and a little thicker cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ. IPhone XS Max has a bit superior CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features just a bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a quite worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone XS Max captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a worse video quality, a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a way less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone XS Max, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.