Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40, having a overall score of 84.5 against 77.2. IPhone XS Max is a somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 40, but both are equally thin. The iPhone XS Max counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Motorola Edge 40 features a display that's just as good as Apple iPhone XS Max's screen, because although the Motorola Edge 40 has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have a screen of the same size, it also counts with way more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 has a better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations, a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.