Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a score of 84.5 against 77. Despite of the fact iPhone XS Max is extremely older and heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's body is still a little thinner. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little bit better screen than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a quite worse display density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, and they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way brighter screen.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3179mAh. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.