Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max, getting an 87.1 score against 84.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is a lot newer and just a little lighter than Apple iPhone XS Max's, although it's also thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display and way more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone XS Max counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has less RAM and 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.