Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Smoke black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Moto G Power, having a score of 84.5 against 76.1. Although Apple iPhone XS Max is older and a bit heavier than Moto G Power, it's body is still much thinner. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a greater processing power than Moto G Power, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS Max has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a just a little better screen density, a quite bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
IPhone XS Max shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, a lower video definition and a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57 percent bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.