Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than iPhone XS Max's general score of 84.5. Motorola Moto G200 5G's design is incredibly newer and a little lighter, but also thicker than iPhone XS Max. The iPhone XS Max counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Moto G200 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage.
The Moto G200 5G captures better photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.