Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Moto Z Force, getting an 84.5 score against 75.8. Although Apple iPhone XS Max is way newer than the Moto Z Force, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a greater processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS Max also has a 64-bit processing unit and more cores. IPhone XS Max takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, they both have the same aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.