Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2018-09-21 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a score of 84.5 against 76.4. IPhone XS Max's construction is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The iPhone XS Max features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1242 x 2688, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a superior processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a 64-bits processing unit and more processing cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
The iPhone XS Max shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a back camera with much less megapixels and a worse video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.