Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action, getting a global score of 84.5 against 78.5. The iPhone XS Max design is thinner than the Motorola One Action, but it is heavier and was released about 11 months before. The iPhone XS Max has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because it has a bit higher pixel number in each display inch, a little bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a better processing power than Motorola One Action, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone XS Max shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone XS Max also has faster video frame rate.
Motorola One Action counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Action counts with a little longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Action, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.