Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than the iPhone XS Max's score of 84.5. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is notably newer and just a bit lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than iPhone XS Max. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone XS Max has a much better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola razr (2020) takes much better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone XS Max features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs more money than iPhone XS Max, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the iPhone XS Max. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the iPhone XS Max, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.