Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Ocean |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 84.5 score against 83.1. Apple iPhone XS Max is an older and a bit heavier phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but Apple could make it somewhat thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than iPhone XS Max, because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a little bit bigger screen, a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and more brightness.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.