Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's general score of 76. The iPhone XS Max is a noticeably older and heavier phone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but Apple could make it a bit thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little more vivid display than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, and they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with much more brightness.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The iPhone XS Max features a bit superior processor than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 42% greater battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Neo captures much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a back facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone XS Max costs a bit more money than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.