Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | -- |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 84.5 score against 77. The iPhone XS Max is a somewhat heavier phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but they are equally thin. The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has much less brightness, and they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a quite better pixel quantity per inch of display and a little higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity. IPhone XS Max has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max features a really longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a superior camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.