Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G, getting a global score of 84.5 against 82.1. IPhone XS Max is a noticeably older and a little heavier cellphone than Galaxy A13 5G, but Apple was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. The iPhone XS Max has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has lesser cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a way better display density and a much higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G captures clearer videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A13 5G counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as Apple iPhone XS Max, they have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.