Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 456 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s, having a score of 84.5 against 77. The Apple iPhone XS Max is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A20s, but Apple could make it just a little thinner anyway. IPhone XS Max features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A20s, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone XS Max has a way better screen than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone XS Max also has a much better pixel number per inch of display and a much higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. The Galaxy A20s has a much greater memory for applications and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A20s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
IPhone XS Max features a superior camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, and they both have a same size aperture, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A20s has longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.