Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the iPhone XS Max's 84.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter than the iPhone XS Max's, although it is also somewhat thicker. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a more powerful processor than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per inch in the display and a slightly better 1242 x 2688 resolution. The Galaxy A22 5G has a slightly better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.