Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with an 84.5 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone XS Max is much older and just a little heavier than Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a much faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS Max has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has much less brightness, and they both have a screen with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a just a bit better screen pixels density. Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.