Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max's 84.5 overall score. The Galaxy A52 is a noticeably newer and a bit lighter device than the Apple iPhone XS Max, although it is a little bit thicker. IPhone XS Max counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy A52, because although it has less RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XS Max has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a quite better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution and a little higher pixels count in each inch of display. Galaxy A52 captures better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy A52 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.