Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than iPhone XS Max, having a 91.3 score against 84.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit thicker than iPhone XS Max, it's a bit lighter and newer. IPhone XS Max features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a bit more pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1242 x 2688px resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much longer battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 42% larger battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G has a better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a way larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.