Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a bit better than Apple iPhone XS Max, getting a global score of 91.1 against 84.5. Even though Galaxy A52s is just a bit thicker than Apple iPhone XS Max, it's a bit lighter and notably newer. IPhone XS Max has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone XS Max features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a quite greater display density and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. Galaxy A52s counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52s takes much clearer videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.